Taxonomic remark There is currently debate on the validity of this species. Glöer (2018, 2019) and Sands et al. (2020) consider it a valid...
Taxonomic remark There is currently debate on the validity of this species. Glöer (2018, 2019) and Sands et al. (2020) consider it a valid species and synonymous with Theodoxus meridionalis, based on examination of syntypes and genetic data of topotypic material. Martínez-Ortí & Osca (2023), in contrast, consider the taxon a nomen dubium and reinstate T. meridionalis. [details]
original description(ofNeritina callosa Deshayes, 1835)Deshayes, G. P. (1835). Mollusques. pp. 81-203, iii, pls. 18-28, 1 text fig. In: J.-B.-G.-M. Bory de Saint-Vincent (ed.), <i>Expédition scientifique de Morée. Section des sciences physiques. Tome III (1.re Partie). Zoologie</i>. Paris, F.G. Levrault. , available online athttps://books.google.com/books?id=5_OZq_dzQDgC page(s): 156, pl. 19, figs. 16-18 [details]
original description(ofNeritina hidalgoi Crosse, 1880)Crosse, H. (1880). Description d'une nouvelle espèce de Neritina d'Espagne. Journal de Conchyliologie, 28: 320-322, 1 plate. Paris. page(s): 320-322, pl. 11, fig. 2 [details]
original description(ofNeritina velascoi Graells, 1846)Graells, M.P. (1846). Catalogo de los moluscos terrestres y de agua dulce observados en España, y descripción y notas de algunas especies nuevas o poco conocidas del mismo país. Viuda é Hijos de Don Antonia Calleja, Madrid, and Calleja, Ojea y Compañia, Lima. vii + 23 pp., 1 pl., available online athttps://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/14891373 page(s): 20-21, figs. 25-30 [details]
original description(ofNeritina varia Rossmässler, 1835)Rossmässler, E. A. (1835-1837). Iconographie der Land- & Süßwasser- Mollusken, mit vorzüglicher Berücksichtigung der europäischen noch nicht abgebildeten Arten. (1) 1 (1): VI + 1-132. pl. 1-5 [≥ Apr. 1835]; (1) 1 (2): 6 + 1-26. pl. 6-10 [≥ Aug. 1835]; (1) 1 (3): 4 + 1-33. pl. 11-15 [≥ Mar. 1836]; (1) 1 (4): 4 + 1-27. pl. 16-20 [≥ Sept. 1836]; (1) 1 (5/6): 4 + 1–70. pl. 21–30 [≥ Jul. 1837]. [Dresden und Leipzig (Arnoldische Buchhandlung)]., available online athttps://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/24986222 page(s): 18 [details]
original description(ofNerita meridionalis R. A. Philippi, 1836)Philippi, R. A. (1836). Enumeratio molluscorum Siciliae cum viventium tum in tellure tertiaria fossilium quae in itinere suo observavit. Vol. 1. xiv + 267 p., pls. 1-12. Sumptibus Simonis Schroppii et Sociorum. Berolini [Berlin]. , available online athttps://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/46935803 page(s): 159-160, pl. 9, fig. 13 [details]
original description(ofNeritina anatensis G. B. Sowerby II, 1849)Sowerby, G. B. II. (1849). Monograph of the genus <i>Neritina</i>. In G. B. Sowerby II (ed.), <i>Thesaurus conchyliorum, or monographs of genera of shells</i>. Vol. 2 (10): 507-546, pls. 109–116. London, privately published. , available online athttps://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/11075613 page(s): 535, pl. 116, figs 247, 248 [details]
original description(ofNerita (Theodoxus) philippii Récluz, 1841)Récluz, C. A. (1841). Description de quelques nouvelles espèces de Nérites vivantes. <em>Revue Zoologique, par la Société Cuvierienne.</em> 1841(4): 102-109; 1841(5): 147-152; 1841(6): 177-182; 1841(9): 273-278; 1841(10): 310-318; 1841(11): 337-343., available online athttp://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/2361985 page(s): 341. [details]
basis of recordGlöer, P. (2018). On the identity of <i>Neritina baetica</i> Lamarck, 1822 and <i>Nerita meridionalis</i> Philippi, 1836 (Gastropoda: Neritidae) from the Iberian Peninsula. <em>Ecologica Montenegrina.</em> 18: 133-137., available online athttps://doi.org/10.37828/em.2018.18.14[details] Available for editors [request]
additional sourceMartínez-Ortí, A.; Osca, D. (2023). Contribution to the taxonomic study of <i>Theodoxus</i> Montfort, 1810 (Mollusca, Gastropoda: Neritidae) from the Iberian Peninsula and Balearic Islands. <em>Zoolentia.</em> 3: 1-17., available online athttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7613283[details]
additional sourceEichhorst, T. E. (2016). <i>Neritidae of the world. Volume two</i>. <em>Harxheim: Conchbooks. Pp. 695-1366.</em> page(s): 903, pl. 270-271 [details]
Present Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
From editor or global species database
Taxonomic remark There is currently debate on the validity of this species. Glöer (2018, 2019) and Sands et al. (2020) consider it a valid species and synonymous with Theodoxus meridionalis, based on examination of syntypes and genetic data of topotypic material. Martínez-Ortí & Osca (2023), in contrast, consider the taxon a nomen dubium and reinstate T. meridionalis. [details] Type locality Andalucia [details]