original description
Starobogatov, Ya.I. (2000). Caspian endemic genus <em>Andrusovia</em> (Gastropoda Pectinibranchia Horatiidae). <em>Ruthenica.</em> 10(1): 37-42.
page(s): 39-41, fig. 1B [details]
basis of record
Kantor Yu.I. & Sysoev A.V. (2006) <i>Marine and brackish water Gastropoda of Russia and adjacent countries: an illustrated catalogue.</i> Moscow: KMK Scientific Press. 372 pp. + 140 pls., available online at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350432257_Marine_and_brackish-water_Gastropoda_of_Russia_and_adjacent_countries_an_illustrated_catalogue [details]
additional source
Vinarski, M. V.; Kantor, Yu. I. (2016). Analytical catalogue of fresh and brackish water molluscs of Russia and adjacent countries. A. N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution of Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, 544 pp.
page(s): 214 [details] Available for editors [request]
additional source
Wesselingh, F. P.; Neubauer, T. A.; Anistratenko, V. V.; Vinarski, M.; Yanina, T.; ter Poorten, J. J.; Kijashko, P.; Albrecht, C.; Anistratenko, O. Y.; D'Hont, A.; Frolov, P.; Gándara, A. M.; Gittenberger, A.; Gogaladze, A.; Karpinsky, M.; Lattuada, M.; Popa, L.; Sands, A. F.; Van de Velde, S.; Vandendorpe, J.; Wilke, T. (2019). Mollusc species from the Pontocaspian region – an expert opinion list. <em>ZooKeys.</em> 827: 31-124., available online at https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.827.31365
page(s): 99 [details] Available for editors [request]
source of synonymy
Anistratenko, V. V.; Neubauer, T. A.; Anistratenko, O. Yu.; Kijashko, P. V.; Wesselingh, F. P. (2021). A revision of the Pontocaspian gastropods of the subfamily Caspiinae (Caenogastropoda: Hydrobiidae). <em>Zootaxa.</em> 4933(2): 151-197., available online at https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4933.2.1
page(s): 158-161 [details] Available for editors [request]
From editor or global species database
Type locality Eastern part of the South Caspian Sea, 39°05’N, 52°35’E, 39 m [details]
Validity The species has been listed as accepted in recent species catalogues, but there is considerable doubt about its validity given the morphological similarity to congeners (see Wesselingh et al. 2019). Until molecular data are available to ascertain its identity, we treat the present species as a nomen dubium. [details]