original description
Philippi, R. A. (1845). Diagnoses testaceorum quorundam novorum. <em>Zeitschrift für Malakozoologie.</em> 2(10): 147-152., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/16291735
page(s): 147 [details]
additional source
Philippi, R. A. (1842-1850). <i>Abbildungen und Beschreibungen neuer oder wenig gekannter Conchylien unter Mithülfe mehrerer deutscher Conchyliologen</i>. Cassel, T. Fischer: Vol. 1: 1-20 [1842], 21-76 [1843], 77-186 [1844], 187-204 [1845]; Vol. 2: 1-64 [1845], 65-152 [1846], 153-232 [1847] ; Vol. 3: 1-50 [1847], 51-82 [1848], 1-88 [1849], 89-138 [1850]. , available online at http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/41582
page(s): 1849 p. 11 [details]
additional source
Bayer C. (1937). Catalogue of the Doliidae in the Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie. <em>Zoologiscshe Mededelingen.</em> 20(5): 29-50., available online at http://www.repository.naturalis.nl/document/149627
page(s): 50 [details] Available for editors [request]
From editor or global species database
Taxonomy Bayer (1937:50) recombines Dolium as subgenus , and refers to the erroneous name of Philippi (1845:147) as "Dolium (Dolium) haemostomum Philippi, nom. nud.", yet refers to both publications of Philippi (1845:147 as well as 1849:11). [details]
Taxonomy At the description of Dolium ampullaceum, Philippi (1845:147) writes: "Ab affini D. galea, quod D. haemastumum Jayi dicitur, ....". In January, 1849 (Abbildungen und Beschreibungen ... p. 11), Philippi writes "Ich bin, seit ich die obige Diagnose gegeben, in den Bezitz von Jay's Catalog gekommen, und finde, dass darin nicht ein D. haemastomum sondern ein D. melanostomum, welches eine sehr ausgezeichnete Art ist, beschrieben worden.".
It is as such clear that the name Dolium haemastomum merely is an error by lack of information rather than a destinct species or a synonym. As Philippi (1845:147) clearly mentions a description by Jay, authority for the erroneous name Dolium haemostomum is here considered as "Jay". [details]