original description
Fuchs, T. (1881). Ueber die miocänen <i>Pecten</i>-Arten aus den nördlichen Appeninen in der Sammlung des Herrn Dr. A. Manzoni. <em>Verhandlungen der Kaiserlich-Königlichen Geologischen Reichsanstalt.</em> 1881(16): 318-322. Wien., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/39143468
page(s): 319 [details]
additional source
Roger J. (1939). Le genre <i>Chlamys</i> dans les formations néogènes de l'Europe: conclusions générales sur la répartition géographique et stratigraphique des pectinidés du tertiaire récent. <em>Mémoire de la Société géologique de France.</em> 40: 1-249. [details]
additional source
Teppner, W. von. (1922). Lamellibranchia Tertiaria, Anisomyaria II. <em>In C. Diener, ed., Fossilium Catalogus, I. Animalia, Pars (15). W. Junk. Berlin.</em> p. 67–296., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/50675959
page(s): 122 [details]
source of synonymy
Friedberg, W. (1936). Mięczaki mioceńskie ziem polskich (Mollusca miocaenica Poloniae). Część II. - Małże (Pars II. Lamellibranchiata). Zeszyt drugi (fasc. secundus). Polskie Towarzystwo Geologiczne, Kraków, pp. 159-274, pls. 25-26.
page(s): 224 [details] Available for editors [request]
From editor or global species database
Status Friedberg (1936) wrote "I also see no difference between our specimens [Chlamys seniensis var. lomnickii (Hilber, 1882)] and P. sanmarinensis Fuchs" (translated from Polish). However, Fuchs' name would have priority. Hilber's species was later synonymized with Aequipecten scabrellus (Lamarck, 1819) (see e.g. Studencka 1986 Palaeontologia Polonica 47). [details]