MolluscaBase taxon details
Batequeus ducenticostatus D. C. Campbell, 1995 †
1637974 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1637974)
accepted
Species
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
fossil only
Campbell, D. C. (1995). New molluscan faunas from the Eocene of South Carolina. <em>Tulane Studies in Geology and Paleontology.</em> 27: 119-152.
page(s): 128-130, pl. 1, fig. 8, pl. 2, figs 1, 2, pl. 3, figs 1, 2 [details] Available for editors
[request]
page(s): 128-130, pl. 1, fig. 8, pl. 2, figs 1, 2, pl. 3, figs 1, 2 [details] Available for editors

Type locality contained in South Carolina
type locality contained in South Carolina [details]
MolluscaBase eds. (2025). MolluscaBase. Batequeus ducenticostatus D. C. Campbell, 1995 †. Accessed at: https://www.molluscabase.org/aphia.php/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1637974 on 2025-09-11
Date
action
by
The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution 4.0 License
original description
Campbell, D. C. (1995). New molluscan faunas from the Eocene of South Carolina. <em>Tulane Studies in Geology and Paleontology.</em> 27: 119-152.
page(s): 128-130, pl. 1, fig. 8, pl. 2, figs 1, 2, pl. 3, figs 1, 2 [details] Available for editors
[request]
additional source Waller, T. R. (2006). New phylogenies of the Pectinidae (Mollusca: Bivalvia): reconciling morphological and molecular approaches. In: Shumway, S. E.; Parsons, G. J. (eds) Scallops: biology, ecology and aquaculture, second edition. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 1-44.
page(s): 16 [details] Available for editors
[request]
page(s): 128-130, pl. 1, fig. 8, pl. 2, figs 1, 2, pl. 3, figs 1, 2 [details] Available for editors

additional source Waller, T. R. (2006). New phylogenies of the Pectinidae (Mollusca: Bivalvia): reconciling morphological and molecular approaches. In: Shumway, S. E.; Parsons, G. J. (eds) Scallops: biology, ecology and aquaculture, second edition. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 1-44.
page(s): 16 [details] Available for editors





From editor or global species database
Classification Waller (2006) stated that the species "is not a Batequeus but rather is a member of the Chlamys group." [details]