Traits taxon details
Sogdianella zekelii (Kollmann, 1965) †
1742671 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1742671)
accepted
Species
Actaeonella laevis zekelii Kollmann, 1965 † · unaccepted (superseded rank and combination)
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
fossil only
(of Actaeonella laevis zekelii Kollmann, 1965 †) Kollmann, H. A. (1965). Actaeonellen (Gastropoda) aus der ostalpinen Oberkreide. <em>Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien.</em> 68: 243-262.
page(s): 248-250, pl. 1, figs 1-4 [details] Available for editors
page(s): 248-250, pl. 1, figs 1-4 [details] Available for editors

MolluscaBase eds. (2024). MolluscaBase. Sogdianella zekelii (Kollmann, 1965) †. Accessed through: Marine Species Traits editorial board (2024) Marine Species Traits at: https://marinespecies.org/traits./aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1742671 on 2025-03-22
Marine Species Traits editorial board (2025). Marine Species Traits. Sogdianella zekelii (Kollmann, 1965) †. Accessed at: https://marinespecies.org/traits/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1742671 on 2025-03-22
Date
action
by
original description
(of Actaeonella laevis zekelii Kollmann, 1965 †) Kollmann, H. A. (1965). Actaeonellen (Gastropoda) aus der ostalpinen Oberkreide. <em>Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien.</em> 68: 243-262.
page(s): 248-250, pl. 1, figs 1-4 [details] Available for editors
basis of record Sohl, N. F.; Kollmann, H. A. (1985). Cretaceous actaeonellid gastropods from the western hemisphere. <em>United States Geological Survey Professional Paper.</em> 1304: 1-104.
page(s): 90; note: the combination "Sogdianella laevis zekelii" is clearly inadvertent, since the authors consider laevis to belong in Actaeonella [details] Available for editors
page(s): 248-250, pl. 1, figs 1-4 [details] Available for editors

basis of record Sohl, N. F.; Kollmann, H. A. (1985). Cretaceous actaeonellid gastropods from the western hemisphere. <em>United States Geological Survey Professional Paper.</em> 1304: 1-104.
page(s): 90; note: the combination "Sogdianella laevis zekelii" is clearly inadvertent, since the authors consider laevis to belong in Actaeonella [details] Available for editors
