MolluscaBase name details
Aenigmomphiscola kazakhstanica Kruglov & Starobogatov, 1981
716797 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:716797)
unaccepted (a junior synonym of Aenigmomphiscola uvalievae)
Species
Kruglov, N.D.; Starobogatov, Ya.I. (1981). A new genus of the Lymnaeidae and taxonomy of the subgenus <em>Omphiscola</em> (<em>Lymnaea</em>) (Pulmonata, Gastropoda). <em>Zoologicheskiy Zhurnal.</em> 60(7): 965-977. [details] Available for editors 
[request]
[request]
Taxonomy "It is demonstrated that Aenigmomphiscola uvalievae and A. kazakhstanica cannot be distinguished in syntopy by their...
Taxonomy "It is demonstrated that Aenigmomphiscola uvalievae and A. kazakhstanica cannot be distinguished in syntopy by their conchological traits, and, possibly, these are conspecific." (Vinarski & Grebennikov 2012: 159). [details]
MolluscaBase eds. (2021). MolluscaBase. Aenigmomphiscola kazakhstanica Kruglov & Starobogatov, 1981. Accessed at: http://molluscabase.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=716797 on 2025-09-10
Date
action
by
The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution 4.0 License
original description
Kruglov, N.D.; Starobogatov, Ya.I. (1981). A new genus of the Lymnaeidae and taxonomy of the subgenus <em>Omphiscola</em> (<em>Lymnaea</em>) (Pulmonata, Gastropoda). <em>Zoologicheskiy Zhurnal.</em> 60(7): 965-977. [details] Available for editors [request]
source of synonymy Vinarski, M. V.; Grebennikov, M. E. (2012). A review of the species of the genus <i>Aenigmomphiscola</i> Kruglov et Starobogatov Gastropoda: Pulmonata: Lymnaeidae). <em>Ruthenica.</em> 22(2): 159-170. [details]
[request]source of synonymy Vinarski, M. V.; Grebennikov, M. E. (2012). A review of the species of the genus <i>Aenigmomphiscola</i> Kruglov et Starobogatov Gastropoda: Pulmonata: Lymnaeidae). <em>Ruthenica.</em> 22(2): 159-170. [details]
From editor or global species database
Taxonomy "It is demonstrated that Aenigmomphiscola uvalievae and A. kazakhstanica cannot be distinguished in syntopy by their conchological traits, and, possibly, these are conspecific." (Vinarski & Grebennikov 2012: 159). [details]
