FreshGEN taxon details
Melanopsis croatica decostata Penecke, 1884 †
823901 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:823901)
accepted
Subspecies
Melanopsis decostata Penecke, 1884 † · unaccepted > superseded rank
fossil only
(of Melanopsis decostata Penecke, 1884 †) Penecke, K.A. (1884). Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Fauna der slavonischen Paludinenschichten. II. <em>Congeria, Pisidium, Cardium</em> und die Gasteropoden. <em>Beiträge zur Paläontologie Österreich-Ungarns und des Orients.</em> 4, 15-44., available online at http://www.biologiezentrum.at/pdf_frei_remote/BPalOeU_004_0015-0044.pdf
page(s): 22, pl. 10, fig. 7 [details]
page(s): 22, pl. 10, fig. 7 [details]
Taxonomic remark Brusina (1902) listed the taxon "M. croatica decostata" in his account of Tertiary fossil mollusks of SE Europe. Although...
Taxonomic remark Brusina (1902) listed the taxon "M. croatica decostata" in his account of Tertiary fossil mollusks of SE Europe. Although Brusina marked it as new (asterisk), he probably did not intend to introduce a new subspecies. More likely, he referred to the species of Penecke (1884), which he had ranked as subspecies of M. croatica already in an earlier work (Brusina 1897). Both Brusina's (1902) and Penecke's (1884) specimens look very similar and derive from the same region in NE Croatia. Therefore, Brusina's (1902) record should not be regarded as a separate taxon. [details]
MolluscaBase eds. (2024). MolluscaBase. Melanopsis croatica decostata Penecke, 1884 †. Accessed through: Neubauer, T.A.; Harzhauser, M.; Kroh, A.; Georgopoulou, E.; Mandic, O. (2014) Freshwater Gastropods of the European Neogene database (FreshGEN) at: https://marinespecies.org/freshgen/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=823901 on 2024-11-20
Neubauer, T.A.; Harzhauser, M.; Kroh, A.; Georgopoulou, E.; Mandic, O. (2014). Freshwater Gastropods of the European Neogene database (FreshGEN). Melanopsis croatica decostata Penecke, 1884 †. Accessed at: https://www.marinespecies.org/freshgen/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=823901 on 2024-11-20
Date
action
by
original description
(of Melanopsis decostata Penecke, 1884 †) Penecke, K.A. (1884). Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Fauna der slavonischen Paludinenschichten. II. <em>Congeria, Pisidium, Cardium</em> und die Gasteropoden. <em>Beiträge zur Paläontologie Österreich-Ungarns und des Orients.</em> 4, 15-44., available online at http://www.biologiezentrum.at/pdf_frei_remote/BPalOeU_004_0015-0044.pdf
page(s): 22, pl. 10, fig. 7 [details]
basis of record Wenz, W. (1923-1930). Fossilium Catalogus I: Animalia. Gastropoda extramarina tertiaria. W. Junk, Berlin. Vol. I: 1-352 pp. (1923), Vol. II: 353-736 pp. (1923), Vol. III: 737-1068 pp. (1923), Vol. IV: 1069-1420 pp. (1923), Vol. V: 1421-1734 pp. (1923), Vol. VI: 1735-1862 pp. (1923), Vol. VII: 1863-2230 pp. (1926), Vol. VIII: 2231-2502 pp. (1928), Vol. IX: 2503-2886 pp. (1929), Vol. X: 2887-3014 pp. (1929), Vol. XI: 3015-3387 pp. (1930)., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/bibliography/61839#/summary
page(s): 2698 [details]
page(s): 22, pl. 10, fig. 7 [details]
basis of record Wenz, W. (1923-1930). Fossilium Catalogus I: Animalia. Gastropoda extramarina tertiaria. W. Junk, Berlin. Vol. I: 1-352 pp. (1923), Vol. II: 353-736 pp. (1923), Vol. III: 737-1068 pp. (1923), Vol. IV: 1069-1420 pp. (1923), Vol. V: 1421-1734 pp. (1923), Vol. VI: 1735-1862 pp. (1923), Vol. VII: 1863-2230 pp. (1926), Vol. VIII: 2231-2502 pp. (1928), Vol. IX: 2503-2886 pp. (1929), Vol. X: 2887-3014 pp. (1929), Vol. XI: 3015-3387 pp. (1930)., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/bibliography/61839#/summary
page(s): 2698 [details]
From editor or global species database
Taxonomic remark Brusina (1902) listed the taxon "M. croatica decostata" in his account of Tertiary fossil mollusks of SE Europe. Although Brusina marked it as new (asterisk), he probably did not intend to introduce a new subspecies. More likely, he referred to the species of Penecke (1884), which he had ranked as subspecies of M. croatica already in an earlier work (Brusina 1897). Both Brusina's (1902) and Penecke's (1884) specimens look very similar and derive from the same region in NE Croatia. Therefore, Brusina's (1902) record should not be regarded as a separate taxon. [details]
